People & Hiring
“Two strong candidates, one role, and a panel that cannot agree.”
Intelligent decision coach
Turn uncertainty into a decision you can explain.
Phronexia helps growing teams work through difficult decisions — structuring the problem, comparing options, involving the right people and preserving the reasoning behind what you choose.
The decision gap
Growing companies rarely have an information problem.
They have a decision-clarity problem. The numbers are there; what's missing is a shared way to turn them into a choice someone can explain.
Too many opinions
Everyone has a view, and no agreed way to weigh them.
Scattered across meetings and chats
The reasoning lives in a call nobody recorded and a thread nobody can find.
Everything routes through one person
The founder becomes the bottleneck for calls the team could make.
No clear rationale
The decision exists, but nobody can point to why it was made.
The same debates repeat
Settled questions come back every quarter, starting from zero.
How Phronexia works
Four steps from stuck to decided.
You bring the dilemma. Phronexia brings the structure — and keeps the reasoning where you can find it later.
- 1
Tell us what you're trying to decide
In your own words. Phronexia asks questions until the problem is clear — scope, constraints, who is affected.
- 2
Structure options, criteria and context
Set out what's on the table and what actually matters, drafted with you and edited by you.
- 3
Compare, collaborate and test the reasoning
Bring in the people with a stake, see where views differ, and check how fragile the result is.
- 4
Get an explainable decision report
The options, criteria, assumptions and rationale in one record — with the final call made by a person.
The methods underneath, for those who want them
Behind the guided flow, Phronexia uses established multi-criteria decision methods — weighted sum, AHP, TOPSIS, VIKOR and PROMETHEE — and suggests the one that fits the shape of your problem. You never have to pick one; the report says which ran and why.
A set of AI agents does the groundwork: clarifying the problem, drafting criteria, checking scores for anchoring and other biases, and writing the report. Every output is a proposal you approve, edit or reject.
Decisions across the organization
Start from the decision in front of you.
Six families of decisions growing companies make every month — each with templates that set out what to consider.
Product
“Everything on the roadmap is someone's top priority.”
Marketing
“Three campaign concepts, one budget, and no agreed way to compare them.”
Strategy & Leadership
“The market-entry question keeps coming back to the same meeting unresolved.”
Operations
“Two vendors, a renewal date, and a switching cost nobody has written down.”
Finance & Investment
“A capital allocation everyone has an opinion on and nobody has modelled together.”
From opinions to structured alignment
Disagreement should be visible, not lost in a meeting.
Invite the people with a stake in the decision, collect their views, and make disagreement visible instead of losing it in a meeting.
- Invite stakeholders
- Collect their views
- See where they disagree
- Compare the reasoning
- Keep a shared record
EvolvingTeam collaboration
Example · shared decision
What ships next quarter?
Visible to the 4 people invited to this decision
| Criterion | Product | Engineering | Sales | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Customer impact | 9 | 5 | 9 | Split |
| Effort to build | 4 | 8 | 3 | Split |
| Strategic fit | 8 | 8 | 7 | Aligned |
Engineering · “Customer impact is real, but the effort score assumes the new API. Without it this is a two-quarter build.”
Explainable by design
Phronexia doesn't make the decision for you. It makes the logic visible.
Every recommendation shows its evidence: the criteria and their weights, the assumptions it rests on, how sensitive it is to the judgements you're least sure of, and the rationale — so the people who decide can stand behind it.
Human accountability remains with your team.
Example decision report
Senior backend hire · Candidate A vs Candidate B
Recommendation
Candidate B
Stronger on system design and ramp-up; Candidate A leads on cost.
Criteria and weights
System design30%
Team fit25%
Ramp-up time20%
Cost15%
Growth potential10%
- Assumption ·
- Start date within six weeks; salary band confirmed.
- Sensitivity ·
- B stays first unless team fit drops below 15% weight.
- Final call ·
- Head of Engineering, with the reasons on record.
How this was calculated
TOPSIS, chosen because the criteria mix costs and benefits on different scales. Three interviewers scored independently; one anchoring risk was flagged and resolved before the result was computed.
Decision memory
Don't start from zero every time.
Every decision leaves a structured record: what you considered, why you chose, who took part and what happened next.
EvolvingDecisions accumulate into a searchable record, so a question that was settled once does not get relitigated from scratch.
Example · decision history
Search past decisions
- Senior backend hirePeople & Hiring · Sep 2026Outcome check at 30 days
- Choose a CRM vendorOperations · Jun 2026Reviewed at 90 days
- Q3 roadmap prioritiesProduct · Jun 2026Shared with 4 people
- Enter the DACH marketStrategy & Leadership · Mar 2026Lesson recorded
PlannedThe intelligence layer Phronexia is building toward
Over time, decision history shows how an organization actually decides.
Recurring bottlenecks, assumptions that keep turning out wrong, the places teams stop aligning. That layer is not built yet — we say so here, and wherever else it appears.
Organizational decision health
Recurring bottlenecks, repeated assumptions and alignment gaps surfaced across many decisions, not one.
Cross-decision pattern intelligence
Patterns in how an organization decides — where it stalls, what it consistently underweights.
For growing organizations
When complexity grows faster than your decision habits.
Meetings multiply, context gets lost, and more decisions queue behind fewer people. Phronexia creates a shared decision layer — without forcing a heavy governance system on a team that's still moving fast.
- Scaling past the founding team
- Several teams, shared decisions
- Founder as bottleneck
- Rapid hiring
- A company in transition
Pricing
Start free. Grow into it.
Plans move along three dimensions, so you pay for how you actually decide.
Seats
How many people take part in decisions.
Decision capacity
How many decisions you run in a period.
Capability depth
How much structure, history and governance you need.
Free
One person, working through a real decision.
- Guided decision flow
- Criteria and options
- Explainable decision report
- A limited number of decisions
Starter
An individual deciding regularly, who wants the history.
- Everything in Free
- More decisions
- Decision history
- Outcome tracking
TeamFor teams
A team that needs the disagreement in one place.
- Everything in Starter
- Collaborators on a decision
- Shared decision record
- Team templates
Business
Several teams, where decisions cross boundaries.
- Everything in Team
- Multiple teams
- Organization-wide decision history
- Administration and roles
Enterprise
Organizations with governance, security and deployment requirements. Custom terms.
Talk to Sales →Prices are being finalized. Starting free needs no card.